Hiring to expand veterans' services: Q&A with W. 
Scott Gould, deputy secretary of Veterans Affairs
Interview by Ed O'Keefe
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 23, 2010;
B03
The Department of Veterans Affairs plans to hire roughly 105,000 
employees in the next two years as part of the Obama administration's 
expansion of benefits and services for veterans. Deputy Secretary W. 
Scott Gould talked Monday about the hiring plans and other 
department operations.
Q Who exactly are you looking for? Just doctors and nurses or claims 
folks?
We're looking for medical professionals: Doctors, nurses top our lists. 
Also claims processors. We're putting a big emphasis on clearing through
 the backlog. Obviously, in addition to new technology and better 
processes, we need good people to make those judgments.
How's this going to work? Besides a $12.4 million television ad 
campaign, are there recruitment fairs at medical schools or some other 
outreach?
We're airing on the Olympics; we're on all the major award shows. We 
think it's a brand-new way of getting out in front of folks and letting 
them be aware of what the VA has to offer. In addition to that, we're 
looking to streamline our internal processes. So when someone calls, 
they express an interest, they're going to find a more customer-friendly
 VA.
Pretend I'm a med student who's plotting my post-school plans. What 
would be the sales pitch?
Number one, the mission. Taking care of our veterans, taking care of the
 people who have protected our freedom over time. I can't think of a 
better synergy and overlap between a physician who wants to do something
 for their community and heartfelt service to veterans. The second would
 be leadership that gets it. Leadership that's prepared to invest in 
them and develop their careers over time. And the third thing I'd say is
 that we're growing.
Let's talk salary and benefits: Is it comparable if one goes to the 
VA vs. a private hospital?
Surprisingly, yes. Under Title
 38 [regarding veterans' benefits], we have the capacity to pay up 
to $400,000 a year for a physician. . . . We're not as high-paying as 
the highest-paying, but we think we have very respectable compensation.
In addition, you don't have to buy insurance, and you can practice 
medicine anywhere in the country, as long as you have one state where 
you passed your certification. So it's a flexible career; it's one where
 you can move without having to undergo the burden of repeated exams and
 licensure.
One of the big concerns generally with federal hiring, but also at VA, is backlog. What 
guarantee can you give an applicant right now that if they apply they 
will know within a reasonable amount of time? What is a reasonable 
amount of time?
Our goal is 60 days. We're over 100 right now. This is a tremendous 
misalignment between our aspiration, what we think needs to be done to 
match the best in the private sector and the best in the private sector 
-- IBM, a company that can do it in 60 days. We're at 102. We have to do
 a lot of training.
At the end of the day, the ability to hire someone and do it well is an 
intensely personal management-supervisor-level decision. Am I going to 
get Scott Gould and hire him, and why? How do you identify what those 
job requirements are? That's a skill that we have to give and raise up 
for a lot of our managers. We have a lot of middle-level managers who 
have to learn how to do this in a different way.
What is being done here at VA to recruit and hire veterans? We hear 
from readers that it's not being done enough, but you hear from 
civilians who say they're being given too much preference.
And what's that balance, yes. As you know, the president has announced 
the veterans hiring initiative. That entire initiative is 
moving forward under the premise, especially here at VA, that veterans 
do better at serving veterans than non-veterans.
We want a mix of veterans present in that VA workforce that have had the
 common experience, that have served their country in that way. That 
doesn't mean that non-veterans can't do that just as well, but there is a
 sense that, in the veteran community -- that experiences at a young age
 twice the unemployment rate as some in our economy -- that this is 
something that the country can and should do as part of an economic plan
 to help them.
Have you ever collected VA benefits or gone to a VA medical center 
yourself?
I got my master's and doctoral degrees paid for by the VA. And my dad 
was given care in a VA hospital for 11 years. He entered an Alzheimer's 
center when he was in his late 50s and spent 11 years there until his 
death.
You're married to Michele
 Flournoy, undersecretary of defense for policy. What's it like 
being one of Washington's power couples, at least in title and rank?
Thank you for that qualifier. We tend to ignore that as much as 
possible. It's wonderful from a personal side to see her fulfilled and 
doing what she's prepared all her life to do. It's just a wonderful 
thing. I think she feels the same way about me. Very early in the 
morning, two cars pull up to the house, and we each say our goodbyes and
 make sure the lunchboxes are packed and the kids are out the door.
We tend to come home [about] 7 or 8 at night. Both my secretary and 
[Defense] Secretary [Robert 
M.] Gates have been great about trying to approach this in a way 
that allows us to spend time with our family and still get the job done.
How do you defrag from it all? Do you bring work home and talk about 
it, or do you try to find something other than work to talk about it?
You know, probably one of the most interesting conversations in my day 
is right after dinner, when the kids are all assigned to get their 
homework done, the TV is off and I get about 20 minutes with Michele 
over dessert and coffee. We talk about the day's events, and about 
leadership and about politics, and it's a sense of kind of sharing how 
to navigate in Washington and how to do good and how to fulfill your 
dream with a partner who each day is learning as much as I am in my job 
about how to do that.